National Local Roads Congress 2002
State association round up - Western Austalia
Councillor Ian Mickel
President
Western Australian
Local Government Association
Presentation Outline
- LGIP Project Update (Regional Transport Infrastructure Coordination Project)
- Assets and Expenditure Report
- Rural Road Hierarchy
- ROMAN
Regional Transport Infrastructure Coordination Project (RTICP)
A pilot program designed to expand the scope and engagement of local government's role in regional transport infrastructure planning and coordination.
RTICP Background
- Set scene current WA Road Funding Process
- WA Local Government Regional Road Group Model
- May 1995 Agreement Signed
- Criteria Developed
- Process Matured
RTICP History
- WALGA Vision
- Developing a Broader Role for RRG's
- Application June 2001 Approved
- LGIP Application
- 12 month pilot project
- WALGA Great Southern Region most appropriate
- Delays - Change of Government
- Restructuring Government Departments Transport/Main Roads now DPI
RTICP Objectives
The projects objectives are:
- Improve regional cooperation between Councils and regional industries in transport infrastructure planning and implementation;
- Demonstrate Local Government is effective in leaving transport infrastructure planning and implementation in its local area;
- Identify transport infrastructure that targets regional economic development; &
- Identify opportunities for new transport infrastructure funding sources.
RTICP Start Up
- Local Government Perspective
- Pilot Project
- Operates along side RRG activities
- Can we develop Criteria to prioritise projects?
- Can we agree on a regional Local Government Network Plan?
RTICP Challenge
- It would be an advantage for Local Government to be able to identify the main transport Infrastructure project within its region.
- Regionally, can Local Governments agree on what the main project is?
RTICP What's Happened So Far
- GSRRG Letter 20th June 2001 Full Support
- Encouraged by Commonwealth Start Project
- Steering Committee formed (RRG Chair)
- Strategic Planning document collection
- Regions Statistics collected
- Reporting progress to ALGA
- RRG engaged in project
Current Perspective/Foundation
- Locally can you nominate 4 transport projects which are important to your Council?
- Are any of these considered to be regionally significant?
- From a Regional perspective, what does Council consider to be the most important Transport Infrastructure project for the Great Southern?
- What Strategic Plans does Council have addressing Transport needs?
Results
- As anticipated roads faired extremely high
- Major Highways - scored by 6 Councils
- Regional City (Port) by-pass - 5 Councils
- Only 1 project outside Region Southern Link Road
- Only other transport mode mentioned Rail - 4 Councils
- Most projects whilst generally in 1 or 2 Councils were considered to be regionally significant
Coordinator Appointment
- Considered Staff/Secondment/Consultant
- Consultants Appointed
- Regional Port Chief Executive/Councillor
- Meet with each GSRRG Council ASAP
- Developing Criteria for comment
- Criteria to consider triple-bottom line
- Auslink/Opportunities
- Reiterate that this project compliments RRG
- Ensure liaison with Government agencies
RTICP Key Points
- Local Government Perspective
- Continued Regional not Local thinking
- Criteria to prioritise regional transport projects
Assets and Expenditure Report
- 142 out of 142 Councils voluntarily contribute data upon which annual Assets and Expenditure Report is based.
- Report benchmarks Local Government on dollar per person expended, together with outcomes in achieving minimum road network standards required throughout comparable areas and regions.
- Local Government roads in WA have a replacement value of $10.9 billion as at 30 June 2001.
- The written down value of Local Government roads is $7.1 billion, equivalent to 65% of replacement value. This percentage should be about 75% for a well managed road network.
- 35% of the replacement value of Local Government roads has been consumed (lost through depreciation)-an improvement on 39% identified in 1997-98.
- Councils provide 49% of their total expenditure from their own resources.
- Total Local Government expenditure was $354.9 million in 2000-02.
- Local Government's road expenditure from their own resources has increased each year since 1994/95-marking the first agreement on road funding with the State Government.
- This represents a 24% increase from $142.7 million in 1996/97 to $177.1 million in 2000-01.
Sources of Road Funds
Council expenditure $354.9 million
- Private - $5.6 m - 1.6%
- Council - $177.1m - 49.9%
- State - $92.4m - 26.0%
- Federal - $79.8m - 22.5%
Rural Functional Road Hierarchy (FRH)
- Project intends to assist RRG's with planning and prioritisation of road needs
- Criteria agreed:
- Primary Distributor
- Regional Distributor
- Local Distributor
- Access Roads
- Each Local Government applying to their roads
- Each Local Government develop draft FRH
- RRG Reviews intra and inter boundaries
ROMAN Pavement Management Program
- Still 132 out of 142 Councils using ROMAN
- Regional User Groups
- Integration with GPS
- Project to review deterioration model
- Enables State comparison/consistency